Minneapolis Modern-Era Context Study
Minneapolis is the State’s largest “Modern City.” The context study was an examination of the City of Minneapolis between 1930 and 1975. By developing this contextual understanding of the history and architecture of the modern era in Minneapolis, a better understanding of modernism in Minneapolis can be achieved.
In consultation with the City of Minneapolis and the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, and with guidance from the National Park Service, the authors of this context have focused on historical subjects and themes that had a distinct and measurable impact on the built environment in the City, including • The Great Depression, The New Deal, and World War II • Business and Industry • Urban Renewal, Interstate Highways, and Historic Preservation • Residential Development • Education • Religion • Arts, Culture and Recreation • Architecture and Architects. This study can inspire a greater understanding and appreciation of modernism and recent-past architecture at the local and statewide level not only for the layperson but for elected officials and industry professionals.
A historic context is a framework for evaluating buildings for historic significance. A historic context focuses on a geographical area, a historical time frame, related historical themes or subjects, and associated property types. A context is not an exhaustive list of properties eligible for historic designation; instead, it provides information against which a property can be evaluated to determine its historic significance. (Barbara Wyatt, “The Components of a Historic Context: A National Register White Paper,” published by the National Park Service, April 2009)
Visit https://www.mnhs.org/about/leadership
Visit https://www.mnhs.org/preservation/legacy-grants/advisory-committee
$4,500,000 the first year and $6,500,000 the second year are for history programs and projects operated or conducted by or through local, county, regional, or other historical or cultural organizations or for activities to preserve significant historic and cultural resources. Funds are to be distributed through a competitive grant process. The Minnesota Historical Society must administer these funds using established grant mechanisms, with assistance from the advisory committee created under Laws 2009, chapter 172, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), item (ii).
Available upon request. grants@mnhs.org
The short term and intermediate terms targets were certainly achieved. We received a well researched and written context that has set us up for the next steps in the preservation planning process: Phase I and II surveys, of which we are already starting to plan. It is too soon to tell if the long term target will be achieved as we have a long ways to go before we are able to start listing resources in the local and National Registers. This context is certainly a start.
Available upon request, grants@mnhs.org
Ward 1 - Kevin Reich
Ward 2 - Cam Gordon
Ward 3 - Steve Fletcher
Ward 4 - Phillipe Cunningham
Ward 5 - Jeremiah Ellison
Ward 6 - Abdi Warsame
Ward 7 - Lisa Goodman
Ward 8 - Andrea Jenkins
Ward 9 - Alondra Cano
Ward 10 - Lisa Bender
Ward 11 - Jeremy Schroeder
Ward 12 - Andrew Johnson
Ward 13 - Linea Palmisano